🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation could be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to approve a proposal raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. Although it warns of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a solid first step," said a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. An organization founded by the family of a girl who took her own life after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the regional government level amid federal inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed measures requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to follow Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international debate unfolds, the policies of Australia and others show that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.